Hackernews posts about DNSSEC

DNSSEC is a cryptographic protocol that authenticates and secures DNS (Domain Name System) transactions by digitally signing DNS data to prevent spoofing and tampering.

RSS feed for DNSSEC

01
newEuropean governmental DNSSEC: policy and promotion drive adoptioninternetcleanup.foundation
▲ 3aequitas 5d discuss
02
newCommon beliefs about DNSSEC put to the testcircleid.com
▲ 3ibobev 8d discuss
03
newEuropean governmental DNSSEC: policy and promotion drive adoptioninternetcleanup.foundation
▲ 2aequitas 2d discuss
04
newShow HN: Digdeep.fyi – A DNS Debug Tool for DNSSEC, Mail, HTTPdigdeep.fyi
▲ 2oipart 4d discuss
05
newThe DNSSEC Root Signing Ceremonywww.cloudflare.com
▲ 2maxall4 19d discuss
06
newDissecting CVE-2026-27280: An OOB write in Android's DNG rendering engineblog.chess-set.eu
▲ 2paolorusso 24d discuss
07
newDissecting CVE-2026-27280: An OOB write in Android's DNG rendering engine
▲ 1paolorusso 24d discuss
08
newDNSSEC disruption affecting .de domains – Resolvedstatus.denic.de
▲ 747warpspin 190d 💬 411
09
newDynIP – Dynamic DNS with RFC 2136, IPv6, DNSSEC, and BYODdynip.dev
▲ 341dynip 169d 💬 128
10
newCert Authorities Check for DNSSEC from Todaywww.grepular.com
▲ 119zdw 241d 💬 259
11
newWhy do we need DNSSEC?howdnssec.works
▲ 114gpi 510d 💬 222
12
newPassing the Torch – My Last Root DNSSEC KSK Ceremony as Crypto Officer 4technotes.seastrom.com
▲ 72greyface-353d 💬 22
13
newWhy DMARC's new "NP" tag can fail with DNSSECdmarcwise.io
▲ 56matteocontrini 129d 💬 25
14
newThe DNSSEC Root Signing Ceremonywww.cloudflare.com
▲ 23marshblocker 623d 💬 2
15
newWhy we can't have nice private TLD DNSSECegbert.net
▲ 21egberts1 529d 💬 5
16
newAws.com and google.com don't have DNSSEC enabledgist.github.com
▲ 17moquilabs 154d 💬 22
17
newDNS security is important but DNSSEC may be a failed experimentwww.theregister.com
▲ 14elijahwright_474d 💬 1
18
newWhere did DNSSEC go wrong?blog.apnic.net
▲ 14fanf2 423d discuss
19
newQuad9 Enables DNSSEC on All Service Endpointsquad9.net
▲ 11bernd289 217d discuss
20
newWhen DNSSEC goes wrong: how we responded to the .de TLD outageblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 9ascorbic 189d discuss
21
new1.1.1.1 now supports post-quantum DNSSEC, all 2,420 bytes of itblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 8HieronymusBosch 62d 💬 1
22
new1.1.1.1 now supports post-quantum DNSSEC, all 2,420 bytes of itblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 8vg 61d discuss
23
newPreparing for Post Quantum DNSSEC with PowerDNSblog.powerdns.com
▲ 6conductor 35d discuss
24
new1.1.1.1 now supports post-quantum DNSSEC, all 2,420 bytes of itblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 6el_duderino 61d discuss
25
new1.1.1.1 now supports post-quantum DNSSEC, all 2,420 bytes of itblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 5Retro_Dev 60d discuss
26
newDNSSEC Authentication Chaindnsviz.net
▲ 5doener 190d discuss
27
newDNSSEC for Research.gov Is Hoseddnsviz.net
▲ 5krunck 238d discuss
28
new1.1.1.1 now supports post-quantum DNSSEC, all 2,420 bytes of itblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 4selenehyun 56d discuss
29
newWhen DNSSEC goes wrong: how we responded to the .de TLD outageblog.cloudflare.com
▲ 4jgrahamc 188d discuss
30
newCert Authorities Check for DNSSEC from Todaywww.grepular.com
▲ 4amaccuish 241d discuss
31
newThe Excruciating Slow Rise of DNSSECcircleid.com
▲ 4pawal 266d discuss
32
newAgainst DNSSEC (2015)sockpuppet.org
▲ 4mcdonje 430d discuss
33
newAsk HN: What Happened in DNSSEC Yesterday?
▲ 3usr1106 30d 💬 4
34
new1.1.1.1 now supports post-quantum DNSSECwww.nbcnews.com
▲ 3MehrdadKhnzd 62d 💬 2
35
newIgnore DNSSEC if you like MitM attackswhynothugo.nl
▲ 3linggen 139d discuss
36
newDoes the Web Use DNSSEC and Email Authentication? Scanning TopM Domainswww.pwndefend.com
▲ 2882542F3884314B 157d discuss
37
newFor DNSSEC and Why Dane Is Neededblog.technitium.com
▲ 2RGBCube 161d discuss