Hackernews posts about Synology

RSS feed for Synology

01
newWidespread ransomware attacks reported on Synology NAS, including on latest DSMold.reddit.com
▲ 4supersing 43h 💬 1
02
newSynology reverses policy banning third-party HDDswww.guru3d.com
▲ 1037baobun 387d 💬 667
03
newSynology Lost the Plot with Hard Drive Locking Movewww.servethehome.com
▲ 653motiejus 559d 💬 403
04
newThe Synology End Gamelowendbox.com
▲ 457amacbride 427d 💬 355
05
newHow to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS Without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS (2024)neil.computer
▲ 3464diii 115d 💬 250
06
newMigrating a Synology NAS to a UniFi UNAS Pro 8 with Robocopy, SMB Multichannelwww.hanselman.com
▲ 71soheilpro 68d 💬 62
07
newSynology patches unannounced multiple zero-day vulnerabilitieswww.synology.com
▲ 62guiambros 701d 💬 11
08
newSynology DS923 vs. FreeBSD with ZFSblogsystem5.substack.com
▲ 18jmmv 684d 💬 11
09
newAsk HN: What NAS (Synology) do you use in your home lab as a developer?
▲ 11lavren1974 464d 💬 10
10
newSynology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drivesarstechnica.com
▲ 11thunderbong 559d 💬 4
11
newSynology could bring "certified drive" requirements to more NAS devicesarstechnica.com
▲ 10instagib 560d discuss
12
newSynology Locks Key NAS Features Behind Proprietary Drive Requirementwww.tomshardware.com
▲ 9m463 560d 💬 1
13
newSynology hurries out patches for zero-days exploited at Pwn2Ownwww.bleepingcomputer.com
▲ 7aborsy 370d 💬 2
14
newSynology now requires Synology-branded drives for some consumer NAS systemswww.tomshardware.com
▲ 7CharlesW 561d 💬 2
15
newA million+ tenants worth of data accessible via every install of Synologymodzero.com
▲ 7imperialdrive 490d 💬 1
16
newSynology confirms need for its own branded drives in newer Plus-series NASarstechnica.com
▲ 7trbutler 560d 💬 1
17
newSynology could bring "certified drive" requirements to more NAS devicesarstechnica.com
▲ 7LinuxBender 561d discuss
18
newSynology press release regarding changes to HDD compatibilityold.reddit.com
▲ 6ahamez 561d 💬 3
19
newBypassing Synology's dumb drive restrictionswww.xda-developers.com
▲ 6izzdrasil 542d 💬 2
20
newSynology caves, walks back some drive restrictions on upcoming NAS modelsarstechnica.com
▲ 6TMWNN 387d 💬 1
21
newSynology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drivesarstechnica.com
▲ 5thunderbong 558d 💬 1
22
newSetup Paperless-NGX on Synology NAS: The CLI Waybarfooz.xyz
▲ 5devonnull 522d discuss
23
newSynology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drivesarstechnica.com
▲ 5chha 558d discuss
24
newThe only Synology certified SSDs start at $535 for 1.6 TB and PCIe 3.0 speedswww.tomshardware.com
▲ 4LorenDB 485d 💬 1
25
newMore shady stuff from Synology incomingold.reddit.com
▲ 4privacyking 544d 💬 1
26
newSynology zero-click Vulnerability in Photos appwww.wired.com
▲ 4NKosmatos 728d 💬 1
27
newSynology Drive spawning too many connectionsblog.notmyhostna.me
▲ 4speckx 347d discuss
28
newSynology back to requiring first-party driveshoneypot.net
▲ 3kstrauser 104d 💬 3
29
newSynology BeeStation Plus review: An easy-to-use NASwww.zdnet.com
▲ 3CrankyBear 52d discuss
30
newAre Synology Routers Being Abandonednascompares.com
▲ 3giuliomagnifico 146d discuss
31
newSynology is increasingly relying on its own ecosystem for upcoming Plus modelswww.synology.com
▲ 3taubek 509d discuss