Hackernews posts about Turbopack

1. Turbopack, the successor to Webpack (vercel.com)
   626 points by nutlope almost 2 years ago | 312 comments
2. Is Turbopack really 10x faster than Vite? (github.com)
   364 points by jjzhiyuan almost 2 years ago | 165 comments
3. Turbopack Performance Benchmarks (turbo.build)
   99 points by palmdeezy almost 2 years ago | 47 comments
4. Turbopack – The Successor to Webpack (turbo.build)
   12 points by jacobwg almost 2 years ago | 1 comments
5. Next.js 13.2: Statically typed links, Turbopack improvements, Next.js Cache (nextjs.org)
   10 points by leerob over 1 year ago | discuss
6. Next.js 13.1: Improved DX, Turbopack and Middleware Updates (nextjs.org)
   7 points by leerob over 1 year ago | discuss
7. Turbopack: The Rust-powered successor to Webpack (turbo.build)
   3 points by michidk over 1 year ago | discuss
8. Turbopack will support Webpack loaders (twitter.com)
   3 points by palmdeezy over 1 year ago | discuss
9. Turbopack - Rust-powered successor to Webpack (turbo.build)
   3 points by brunojppb almost 2 years ago | discuss
10. Vite vs. Turbopack Benchmark by Evan You (twitter.com)
    2 points by colinchartier almost 2 years ago | discuss
11. Benchmarking Vite vs. Next and turbopack HMR performance (github.com)
    2 points by kretaceous almost 2 years ago | discuss
12. Turbopack looks like it's about to go stable? (areweturboyet.com)
    1 points by bluelightning2k 5 months ago | discuss
13. Next.js Turbopack (nextjs.org)
    1 points by bpierre 5 months ago | discuss
14. Next.js 14: Turbopack Isn't Turbopacking (tomaszs2.medium.com)
    1 points by tomaszs 11 months ago | discuss
15. Turbopack vs. Vite (turbo.build)
    1 points by tosh almost 2 years ago | discuss
16. Is Turbopack 10x faster than Vite? (twitter.com)
    1 points by mariuz almost 2 years ago | discuss